| STATE | DAYS SINCE END DATE | STATE DETAILS |
|---|---|---|
| AK | 23 | |
| AL | 58 | |
| AR | 14 | EDA received UCC filings that were previously unavailable to us, as of November 11, 2010. Arkansas is the only state where UCCs were able to be filed at the county level. Since EDA receives filings through each state’s Secretary of State office, we were not receiving these county-level filings. However, as of 2010, the Arkansas Secretary of State is allowing Secured Parties to re-file UCCs at the state level. What this means for EDA subscribers is that as Secured Parties decide to re-file UCCs with the Arkansas Secretary of State, EDA will be adding this data to your Catapult account.. Gaps in Data: 11/1/2011 |
| AZ | 37 | |
| CA | 25 | |
| CO | 68 | |
| CT | 76 | State is typically slow to deliver data. |
| DC | 40 | |
| DE | 51 | |
| FL | 34 | |
| GA | 40 | |
| HI | 27 | |
| IA | 44 | |
| ID | 30 | |
| IL | 37 | |
| IN | 35 | Gaps in Data: 4/30/2010-5/1/2010; 7/8/2010-7/12/2010; 7/22/2010-7/30/2010 |
| KS | 13 | Gaps in Data: 5/28/2009; 5/27/2011 |
| KY | 16 | Gaps in Data: 11/9/2008-11/15/2008; 3/29/2009-4/4/2009; 4/26/2009-5/2/2009; 2/28/2011; 3/27/2011-3/31/2011 |
| LA | 39 | |
| MA | 35 | |
| MD | 69 | State is typically slow to deliver data. Gaps in Data: 3/12/2009 |
| ME | 30 | |
| MI | 32 | March 2011 -- Great News! In Michigan, there exists a statute that limits the Secretary of State’s office to only deliver UCC data via microfilm. The Secretary of State’s microfilm archiver had been broken January & February which halted UCC delivery to EDA. They are now back up and running and the data has been added to Catapult. |
| MN | 30 | |
| MO | 9 | |
| MS | 23 | Gaps in Data: 9/3/2006 -9/9/2006; 8/24/2008-8/28/2008; 11/21/2010-11/27/2010; 12/30/2010 |
| MT | 68 | During May & June 2010, you may have noticed an increased number of fillings displayed in your New Records that were actually filed in previous years. Montana’s Secretary of State’s office made electronic filings available to us, which we had not been receiving since they were introduced in 2001. We had only been receiving hard copies previously. |
| NC | 23 | |
| ND | 30 | |
| NE | 39 | |
| NH | 51 | Gaps in Data: 9/3/2011-9/22/2011 |
| NJ | 53 | |
| NM | 30 | Gaps in Data: 1/16/2006-1/22/2006; 5/21/2006-5/27/2006 |
| NV | 1883 | In an effort to protect the privacy of debtors, the Secretary of State of Nevada has been working on an automated process to redact (remove) the SSN and Federal Tax ID from UCC filings. In the interim, Nevada has halted data delivery until they could procure the funding and vendor to perform the redaction process. Gaps in Data: 1/22/2003 - 2/21/2004; 3/23/2004 - 4/7/2004; 12/3/2004 - 1/5/2005; 4/12/2006 - 6/21/2006; 9/18/2006 - 9/24/2006 |
| NY | 23 | Gaps in Data: 9/30/2011-9/3/2011 |
| OH | 23 | |
| OK | 44 | Gaps in Data: 1/27/2009; 12/24/2009 |
| OR | 37 | Gaps in Data: 7/22/2008 - 7/24/2008 |
| PA | 37 | Gaps in Data: 4/9/2006 - 4/15/2006; 7/2/2006 - 7/11/2006; 7/14/2006 - 7/19/2006; 8/8/2006 - 8/19/2006 |
| RI | 37 | |
| SC | 37 | |
| SD | 37 | Over the past six years, the South Dakota Secretary of State's office has been unable to deliver traditionally filed UCCs (i.e. paper vs. electronic), which represent roughly a third of all UCCs filed with the state. Two reasons for this decision involve the small number of filings with SSNs displayed and technical difficulties converting paper UCCs to electronic images. SD has recently reasserted their policy concerning traditionally filed UCC's; however, EDA will continue its efforts in hopes of resolving this issue. Gaps in Data: 4/10/2011-4/16/2011 |
| TN | 53 | |
| TX | 16 | |
| UT | 65 | |
| VA | 68 | State is typically slow to deliver data. Gaps in Data: 3/2/2009 |
| VT | 40 | Gaps in Data: 3/4/2008; 6/18/2009 |
| WA | 32 | |
| WI | 37 | |
| WV | 72 | Gaps in Data: 10/14/2010 |
| WY | 25 | Gaps in Data: 7/1/2010; 7/3/2010-7/7/2010; 3/7/2011 |
